Thermodynamic analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle

Authors

Andrey Rogalev1 ID,  Dmitry Kovalev1 ID,  Viacheslav Murashov1*  ID,  Mikhail Ostrovsky1 ID,  Igor Maksimov1 ID
Show Less
1 National Research University“Moscow Power Engineering Institute”,111250 Moscow,Russia
Article ID: 1072
75 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest1072

Keywords:

allam cycle; oxygen-fuel energy system; supercritical carbon dioxide; efficiency; power; thermodynamic optimization

Abstract

The oxy-fuel combustion power cycle (OFPC) based on the Allam cycle with supercritical carbon dioxide is a promising technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While current literature estimates its efficiency with natural gas between 48% and 62%, the impact of the power unit's electrical power capacity on overall efficiency remains underexplored. This study investigates how supplied power affects OFPC net efficiency through preliminary thermodynamic parameter optimization. A comprehensive mathematical model of the OFPC was developed using the Aspen software package. The model integrates key subsystems: a gas turbine unit, cooler-separator, air separation unit, and compressor-storage unit. The modeling results indicate that lowering the working fluid temperature at the cooler-separator outlet to 17 °C boosts the maximum net cycle efficiency to between 51.16% and 53.1%, assuming complete moisture removal in the cooler-separator. Furthermore, a quantitative assessment of the scale effect shows significant benefits from increasing capacity. Scaling the supplied capacity from 50 MW to 800 MW reduces the specific electricity consumption for auxiliary power needs by 37.6%, achieving 1.12 kW/kg O2. In conclusion, utilizing higher-capacity equipment in the OFPC is both technologically and energetically justified. Increasing the supplied capacity from 50 MW to 800 MW effectively increases the overall net efficiency of the Allam cycle by 1.97%.

References

1. Allam RJ, Palmer MR, Brown GW, et al. High Efficiency and Low Cost of Electricity Generation from Fossil Fuels While Eliminating Atmospheric Emissions, Including Carbon Dioxide. Energy Procedia. 2013; 37: 1135–1149.

2. Scaccabarozzi R, Gatti M, Martelli E. Thermodynamic Optimization and Part-load Analysis of the NET Power Cycle. Energy Procedia. 2017; 114: 551–560. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1197

3. MacDowell N, Florin N, Buchard A, et al. An overview of CO2 capture technologies. Energy & Environmental Science. 2010; 3(11): 1645–1669. doi: 10.1039/c004106h

4. Chen D, O’Connell JP, Seider WD. Thermoeconomic analysis of sCO2 power cycles. AIChE Journal. 2024; 70(9): e18502. doi: 10.1002/aic.18502

5. Rogalev A, Grigoriev E, Kindra V, et al. Thermodynamic optimization and equipment development for a high efficient fossil fuel power plant with zero emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 236: 117592. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.067

6. Rogalev A, Rogalev N, Kindra V, et al. Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles with CO2 Recirculation. Energies. 2021; 14(10): 2927. doi: 10.3390/en14102927

7. Kindra V, Rogalev A, Lisin E, et al. Techno-Economic Analysis of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles with Near-Zero Emissions. Energies. 2021; 14(17): 5358. doi: 10.3390/en14175358

8. Saqline S, Yang L, Romagnoli A, et al. Coupling chemical looping air separation with the Allam cycle – A thermodynamic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 418: 138097. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138097

9. Uysal D, Uysal BZ. Thermodynamic analysis of the Allam cycle and its pressure sensitivity. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2021; 7(6): 1448–1456. doi: 10.18186/thermal.990813

10. Bocandé DMP, Rohardt J, Schatz M. The Hydrogen-Fueled Allam Cycle: Thermodynamic Evaluation and Optimization After a Fuel Switch to Hydrogen. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 2026; 148(3): 031002. doi: 10.1115/1.4069572

11. Mosaffa AH, Fallah M, Rahmanpour M. Assessment of the thermodynamic feasibility of a new configuration for enhancing the performance of an Allam cycle using the reheating method. Fuel. 2024; 377: 132798. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132798

12. Alirahmi SM, Sin G, Arabkoohsar A, et al. A Novel Integrated System Driven by Allam Cycle for the Simultaneous Energy, Water, and Waste Management. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2023; 103: 37–42. doi: 10.3303/CET23103007

13. Ahn Y, Bae SJ, Kim M, et al. Review of supercritical CO2 power cycle technology and current status of research and development. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2015; 47(6): 647–661. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2015.06.009

14. Crespi F, Gavagnin G, Sánchez D, et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review. Applied Energy. 2017; 195: 152–183. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.048

15. Alirahmi SM, Qi M, He C, et al. Allam cycle-based integrated energy storage system for cross-sector decarbonization. Journal of Energy Storage. 2025; 130: 117327. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.117327

16. Dago GGB, Frate GF, Baccioli A, et al. Exergy analysis of the Allam cycle: Assessing the impact of regenerator performance on the cycle efficiency. Energy Conversion and Management. 2025; 345: 120358. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120358

17. Xin T, Li S, Yang W, et al. Thermodynamic comparison of cryogenic air separation units with external and internal compression of oxygen designed for the coal-fueled Allam cycle. Energy. 2025; 333: 137325. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137325

18. Li B, He C, Ma R, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and comparative study on syngas-fueled net-zero Allam cycles: Influences of fuel hydrogen content. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2026; 300: 131519. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.131519

19. Chan W, Morosuk T, Li X, et al. Allam cycle: Review of research and development. Energy Conversion and Management. 2023; 294: 117607. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117607

20. Martinelli M, Chiesa P, Martelli E. Techno-economic assessment of the Allam cycle for different plant sizes, oxygen purities and heat integration with external sources. Fuel. 2025; 381: 133383. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133383

21. Scaccabarozzi R, Gatti M, Martelli E. Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle. Applied Energy. 2016; 178: 505–526. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.060

22. Kindra VO, Komarov II, Osipov SK, et al. Thermodynamic Analysis of Semi-Closed Cycles with Oxy-Fuel Combustion and Carbon Dioxide-Steam Working Fluid. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023; (3): 18–33. doi: 10.31857/S0002331023030056

23. Aspentech. Aspen Plus. Available online: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus (accessed on 7 August 2026).

24. Huber ML, Lemmon EW, Bell IH, et al. The NIST REFPROP Database for Highly Accurate Properties of Industrially Important Fluids. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2022; 61(42): 15449–15472. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01427

25. Miao G, Zheng L, Yang C, et al. Performance analysis of a novel SMR process integrated with the oxy-combustion power cycle for clean hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Science. 2025; 302: 120861. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120861

26. Kortikov AV, Tarasova EY, Agekyan GA. Modern Types of Air Separation Units of JSC Cryogenmash for Obtaining Technical Oxygen. Technical Gases. 2010; (2): 31–38.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-19

How to Cite

Rogalev, A., Kovalev, D., Murashov, V., Ostrovsky, M., & Maksimov, I. (2026). Thermodynamic analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest1072

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026)

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Andrey Rogalev, Dmitry Kovalev, Viacheslav Murashov, Mikhail Ostrovsky, Igor Maksimov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.