Optimal PV-BESS-EV system design for a net-zero energy home considering uncertainties and V2H / H2V operation

Authors

Peerapol Jirapong1,  Sekthaphong Chaisuwan1,  Panida Thararak1* 
Show Less
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faulty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Article ID: 580
62 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest580

Keywords:

net-zero energy home; PV–BESS–EV integration; uncertainty modeling; vehicle-to-home; particle swarm optimization

Abstract

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the residential sector, the concept of a net-zero energy home (NZEH) has been adopted to balance energy generation and consumption through adaptive energy control. However, current NZEH research remains limited by fragmented optimization of photovoltaic (PV)–battery energy storage system (BESS)–electric vehicle (EV) integration, unidirectional energy flow in EVs, and insufficient consideration of real-world uncertainties. This study presents an integrated framework for the optimal design and control strategies of an NZEH incorporating PV, BESS, and EV systems, considering both vehicle-to-home (V2H) and home-to-vehicle (H2V) capabilities. Uncertainties in PV power generation, household load demand, and EV usage are addressed using real-world data combined with probabilistic modeling techniques. This approach includes Monte Carlo simulation, normal distribution, and solar radiation data derived from the PVGIS database. The optimal sizing of PV and BESS is formulated as an optimization problem to achieve net-zero energy while maintaining economic feasibility using a particle swarm optimization technique. The results demonstrate that optimal PV and BESS capacities of 3.6 kW and 11.90 kWh, respectively, can achieve net-zero annual energy under flat-rate pricing, considering uncertainties. Accounting for uncertainties increases the optimal PV capacity by 9.5 %, while the optimal BESS capacity decreases by 13.90%–31.16%, depending on the electricity pricing structure. Furthermore, V2H operation enhances energy cost savings by up to 137 %, particularly in scenarios without BESS. The findings indicate that combining optimized system sizing with uncertainty modeling and EV bidirectional operation significantly enhances the technical performance, economic benefits, and flexibility of NZEH.

References

1. Mariano-Hernández D, Hernández-Callejo L, Zorita-Lamadrid A, et al. A review of strategies for building energy management system: Model predictive control, demand side management, optimization, and fault detect & diagnosis. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 33: 101692. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101692

2. Han B, Zahraoui Y, Mubin M, et al. Home energy management systems: A review of the concept, architecture, and scheduling strategies. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 19999–20025. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3248502

3. Kern T, Dossow P, Morlock E. Revenue opportunities by integrating combined vehicle-to-home and vehicle-to-grid applications in smart homes. Applied Energy. 2022; 307: 118187. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118187

4. Jaysawal RK, Chakraborty S, Elangovan D, et al. Concept of net zero energy buildings (NZEB) - A literature review. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2022; 11: 100582. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100582

5. Wu W, Skye HM. Residential net-zero energy buildings: Review and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 142: 110859. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110859

6. Lan L, Wood KL, Yuen C. A holistic design approach for residential net-zero energy buildings: A case study in Singapore. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 50: 101672. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101672

7. Panicker K, Anand P, George A. Assessment of building energy performance integrated with solar PV: Towards a net zero energy residential campus in India. Energy and Buildings. 2023; 281: 112736. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112736

8. Sharma V, Haque MH, Aziz SM. Energy cost minimization for net zero energy homes through optimal sizing of battery storage system. Renewable Energy. 2019; 141: 278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.144

9. Niveditha N, Rajan Singaravel MM. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV–Wind–Battery storage system for Net Zero Energy Buildings to reduce grid burden. Applied Energy. 2022; 324: 119713. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119713

10. Rehman H ur, Diriken J, Hasan A, et al. Energy and Emission Implications of Electric Vehicles Integration with Nearly and Net Zero Energy Buildings. Energies. 2021; 14(21): 6990. doi: 10.3390/en14216990

11. Khan S, Sudhakar K, Yusof MHB, et al. Roof integrated photovoltaic for electric vehicle charging towards net zero residential buildings in Australia. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2023; 73: 340–354. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2023.02.005

12. Rezaei Nasab SS, Tayefi Nasrabadi A, Asadi S, et al. Investigating the probability of designing net-zero energy buildings with consideration of electric vehicles and renewable energy. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2021; 29(10): 4061–4087. doi: 10.1108/ecam-05-2021-0448

13. Liu J, Wu H, Huang H, et al. Renewable energy design and optimization for a net-zero energy building integrating electric vehicles and battery storage considering grid flexibility. Energy Conversion and Management. 2023; 298: 117768. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117768

14. Doroudchi E, Alanne K, Okur Ö, et al. Approaching net zero energy housing through integrated EV. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018; 38: 534–542. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.042

15. Liu J, Chen X, Yang H, et al. Energy storage and management system design optimization for a photovoltaic integrated low-energy building. Energy. 2020; 190: 116424. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116424

16. Ren H, Sun Y, Albdoor AK, et al. Improving energy flexibility of a net-zero energy house using a solar-assisted air conditioning system with thermal energy storage and demand-side management. Applied Energy. 2021; 285: 116433. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116433

17. Lu ML, Sun YJ, Kokogiannakis G, et al. Design of flexible energy systems for nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainty characteristics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024; 205: 114828. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114828

18. Tavakoli A, Karimi A. Development of Monte‐Carlo‐based stochastic scenarios to improve uncertainty modelling for optimal energy management of a renewable energy hub. IET Renewable Power Generation. 2022; 17(5): 1139–1164. doi: 10.1049/rpg2.12671

19. Riaz M, Ahmad S, Hussain I, et al. Probabilistic optimization techniques in smart power system. Energies. 2022; 15(3): 825. doi: 10.3390/en15030825

20. Vivas FJ, Segura F, Andújar JM. Fuzzy logic-based energy management system for grid-connected residential DC microgrids with multi-stack fuel cell systems: A multi-objective approach. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks. 2022; 32: 100909. doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2022.100909

21. Akram AS, Abbas S, Khan MA, et al. Smart energy management system using machine learning. Computers, Materials & Continua. 2024; 78(1): 959–973. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2023.032216

22. Šúri M, Huld TA, Dunlop ED. PV-GIS: A web-based solar radiation database for the calculation of PV potential in Europe. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2005; 24(2): 55–67. doi: 10.1080/14786450512331329556

23. Mohammad A, Zuhaib M, Ashraf I. An optimal home energy management system with integration of renewable energy and energy storage with home to grid capability. International Journal of Energy Research. 2022; 46(6): 8352–8366. doi: 10.1002/er.7735

24. Kim SH, Shin YJ. Optimize the operating range for improving the cycle life of battery energy storage systems under uncertainty by managing the depth of discharge. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 73: 109144. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109144

25. European Commission Joint Research Centre. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS). Available online: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/pvgis_en (accessed on 16 December 2024).

26. Metropolis N, Ulam S. The monte carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949; 44(247): 335–341. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310

27. Cabaneros SM, Hughes B. Methods used for handling and quantifying model uncertainty of artificial neural network models for air pollution forecasting. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2022; 158: 105529. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105529

28. Feng Y, Wu D, Stewart MG, et al. Past, current and future trends and challenges in non-deterministic fracture mechanics: A review. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2023; 412: 116102. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116102

29. Molugaram K, Rao GS. An overview of statistical applications. Statistical Techniques for Transportation Engineering. 2017: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811555-8.00001-5

30. Loftus SC. An incredibly brief introduction to probability. Basic Statistics with R. 2022: 89–99. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-820788-8.00020-1

31. Ramasamy V, Zuboy J, Woodhouse M, et al. U.S. solar photovoltaic system and energy storage cost benchmarks, with minimum sustainable price analysis: Q1 2023. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI); 2023. doi: 10.2172/2005540

32. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995; 4: 1942–1948. doi: 10.1145/3205651.3207877

33. Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings ieee world congress on computational intelligence (Cat No98TH8360). IEEE. 1998; 69–73. doi: 10.1109/icec.1998.699146

34. Zahoor A, Mehr F, Mao G, et al. The carbon neutrality feasibility of worldwide and in China’s transportation sector by E-car and renewable energy sources before 2060. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 61: 106696. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106696

35. Huld T, Müller R, Gambardella A. A new solar radiation database for estimating PV performance in Europe and Africa. Solar Energy. 2012; 86(6): 1803–1815. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.03.006

36. Vatankhah Ghadim H, Haas J, Breyer C, et al. Are we too pessimistic? Cost projections for solar photovoltaics, wind power, and batteries are over-estimating actual costs globally. Applied Energy. 2025; 390: 125856. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125856

37. Energy Regulatory Commission. Electricity tariff information. Available online: http://www.erc.or.th/th/electricity-service-rate (accessed on 12 July 2025).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08

How to Cite

Jirapong, P., Chaisuwan, S., & Thararak, P. (2026). Optimal PV-BESS-EV system design for a net-zero energy home considering uncertainties and V2H / H2V operation. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest580