Macroeconomic variables affecting electricity consumption—A portrait of the capital city of Nusantara (IKN)

Authors

Fitriadi1*  ID Dedy DarmawanID Dio Caisar DarmaID RahmawatiID Nijar Kurnia RomdoniID
Show Less
1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda 75117, Indonesia
2 Study Program of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Praja Tanah Grogot, Paser 76251, Indonesia
3 Study Program of Development Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya 46115, Indonesia
4 Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda 75117, Indonesia
5 Study Program of Accountancy, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya 46115, Indonesia
Article ID: 806
131 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest806

Keywords:

GRDP per capita; household consumption; population; investment; unemployment; poverty; electricity consumption

Abstract

This study examines the linkages between gross regional domestic product (GRDP) per capita, household consumption, population, investment, unemployment, and poverty on electricity consumption. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was applied to three panel data models: panel A (the three IKN buffer zones), panel B (the seven outermost IKN support zones), and panel C (a combination of panels A and B), with the analysis covering the period 2014–2024. Quantitative observations reveal that household consumption and population consistently contribute positively and significantly to electricity consumption across all panels. In panel A, GRDP per capita also has a positive effect, while poverty has a negative effect. In panel B, GRDP per capita and investment actually have a negative effect; yet, the opposite is true in panel C, where GRDP per capita continues to exert a negative influence on electricity consumption. In essence, household consumption and population size are the most consistent variables explaining electricity consumption in the IKN. Building on existing findings, this contribution offers a novel breakthrough by providing several region-based empirical alternatives for evaluating developing regions such as the IKN, an area still relatively under-explored in the literature. Furthermore, it provides an initial understanding of the dynamics of electricity demand during the early stages of IKN’s development, which could pave the way for new approaches to sustainable development policies, particularly in energy planning. Methodological advancements may be considered to enhance future research.

References

1. Junaidi A, Busari A, Kurniawan AE, et al. Spillover effect of human capital and human development in shaping agricultural productivity—Scope of Indonesian Capital City (IKN). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025; 22(4): 942–955. doi: 10.33462/jotaf.1540354

2. Althalets F, Putera MTF, Surgawati I, et al. Lodging service performance and its influencing aspects: An example from National Capital City. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2025; 3(89): 363–384. doi: 10.57017/jaes.v20.3(89).02

3. Fitriadi, Purwinahyu P, Darma DC, et al. Is economic development experiencing a shift? A comparative estimate on the new IKN. Asian Journal of Economics and Business. 2025; 6(2): 143–173.

4. Yusuf AA, Roos EL, Horridge JM, et al. Indonesian capital city relocation and regional economy's transition toward less carbon-intensive economy: An inter-regional CGE analysis. Japan and the World Economy. 2023; 68: 101212. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2023.101212

5. Rosyadi R, Hasid Z, Purwadi P. Energy operations for resident and its implications for economic growth: Indonesia’s New Capital City as a case study. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2023; 13(4): 1–8. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.14182

6. Indrayani. The impact of the relocation of the National Capital City (IKN) of the archipelago on the increased income of MSMEs in Balikpapan City. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research. 2025; 4(6): 928–935. doi: 10.54408/jabter.v4i6.442

7. Acheampong AO, Boateng E, Amponsah M, et al. Revisiting the economic growth–energy consumption nexus: Does globalization matter? Energy Economics. 2021; 102: 105472. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105472

8. Sadorsky P. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy. 2009; 37(10): 4021–4028. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.003

9. Sadorsky P. Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. 2012; 48: 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.064

10. Lucchi E. Integration between photovoltaic systems and cultural heritage: A socio-technical comparison of international policies, design criteria, applications, and innovation developments. Energy Policy. 2022; 171: 113303. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113303

11. Yoo SH, Lee JS. Electricity consumption and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. Energy Policy. 2010; 38(1): 622–625. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.076

12. Chaudhry AA. Panel data analysis of cross-country electricity demand. Actual Problems of Economics. 2013; 144(6): 514–522.

13. Khaled MS, Maliwan K, Taweekun J, et al. Effects of energy consumption, GDP and microfinance on sustainable poverty reduction: Evidence from a developing economy. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19): 8360. doi: 10.3390/su16198360

14. Bakirtas T, Akpolat AG. The relationship between energy consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in new emerging-market countries. Energy. 2018; 147: 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.011

15. Wang Q, Su M, Li R, Ponce P. The effects of energy prices, urbanization and economic growth on energy consumption per capita in 186 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 225: 1017–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.008

16. Number of Electricity Customers, 2022. Available online: https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MzYwIzI=/jumlah-pelanggan-listrik.html (accessed on 16 February 2026).

17. Vo DH, Vo AT, Ho CM. Urbanization and renewable energy consumption in the emerging ASEAN markets: A comparison between short and long-run effects. Heliyon. 2024; 10(9): e30243. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30243

18. Wang S. Differences between energy consumption and regional economic growth under the energy environment. Energy Reports. 2022; 8: 10017–10024. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.065

19. Dong K, Sun R, Dong X. CO2 emissions, natural gas and renewables, economic growth: Assessing the evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment. 2018; 640–641: 293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.322

20. Per Capita Gross Regional Domestic Product at Current Market Prices by Regency/Municipality in Kalimantan Timur Province (Thousand Rupiahs), 2024. Available online: https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/YWtoQlRVZzNiMU5qU1VOSlRFeFZiRTR4VDJOTVVUMDkjMw==/produk-domestik-regional-bruto-per-kapita-atas-dasar-harga-berlaku-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-kalimantan-timur--ribu-rupiah---2022.html?year=2024 (accessed on 14 February 2026).

21. Monthly Average of Food and Non-Food Expenditure per Capita in Urban and Rural Areas by Regency/Municipality in Kalimantan Timur Province, 2016. Available online: https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/V1ZKMWVrSTNOek5ZZUZOcVZEZGFValJvV0hWalFUMDkjMw==/rata-rata-pengeluaran-per-kapita-sebulan-makanan-dan-bukan-makanan-di-daerah-perkotaan-dan-perdesaan-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-kalimantan-timur--rupiah---2021.html?year=2016 (accessed on 14 February 2026).

22. Population by Regency/City in East Kalimantan Province (Thousands), 2025. Available online: https://samarindakota.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NDYwIzI=/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-kalimantan-timur.html (accessed on 15 February 2026).

23. Kalimantan Timur Province in Figures 2025. Available online: https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/02/28/2fd1ffbcf042aa223f3b9b25/provinsi-kalimantan-timur-dalam-angka-2025.html (accessed on 16 February 2026).

24. Unemployment Rate (UR) by Regency/Municipality (Percent), 2024. Available online: https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NTkjMg==/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-tpt-menurut-kabupaten-kota.html (accessed on 17 February 2026).

25. Indeks Kedalaman Kemiskinan (P1) Menurut Kabupaten/Kota, 2025. Available online: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NjIyIzI=/indeks-kedalaman-kemiskinan--p1--menurut-kabupaten-kota.html (accessed on 14 February 2026).

26. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook; IEA; 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022

27. World Bank. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report. World Bank; 2021.

28. Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A. Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 217: 603–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282

29. Roodman D. How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal. 2009; 9(1): 86–136. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0900900106

30. Kaur P, Stoltzfus J, Yellapu V. Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine. 2018; 4(1): 60–63. doi: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_18

31. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2011; 2(1): 21–33.

32. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Routledge; 1988. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

33. Sommet N, Lipps O. A primer on fixed effects and fixed-effects panel modeling using R, Stata, and SPSS. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2025; 8(4): 1–21. doi: 10.1177/25152459251392843

34. Baltagi, BH. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 6th ed. Springer Nature; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5

35. Wooldridge, JM. Two-way fixed effects, the two-way mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators. Empirical Economics. 2025; 69(5): 2545–2587. doi: 10.1007/s00181-025-02807-z

36. Cunningham, S. Causal Inference: The Mixtape. Yale University Press; 2021. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27

37. McFadden D. Epilogue. Journal of Econometrics. 2021; 222(1, Part A): 261–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.001

38. Ditzen J, Karavias Y, Westerlund, J. Testing and estimating structural breaks in time series and panel data in Stata. The Stata Journal. 2025; 25(3): 526–560. doi: 10.1177/1536867X251365449

39. Ozturk I, Acaravci A. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010. 14(9): 3220–3225. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005

40. Hussein HA, Warsame AA, Barre GM, et al. The Nexus between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Degradation in Kenya. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2023; 13(6): 220–226. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.14293

41. Salahuddin M, Gow J, Vink N. Effects of environmental quality on agricultural productivity in sub Saharan African countries: A second generation panel based empirical assessment. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 741: 140520. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140520

42. Garaffa R, Cunha BSL, Cruz T, et al. Distributional effects of carbon pricing in Brazil under the Paris Agreement. Energy Economics. 2021; 101: 105396. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105396

43. Guo X, Huang Y, Liang C, et al. Forecasting volatility of EUA futures: New evidence. Energy Economics. 2022; 110: 106021. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106021

44. Mire MS, Suharto RB. Relationship between socio-economic factors and electrical energy consumption of customer groups in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management. 2024; 12(2): 5911–5924. doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.em09

45. Najeeb A, Sridharan S, Rao AB, et al. Determinants of residential electricity consumption in South, East and South East Asia: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024; 198: 114400. doi: j.rser.2024.114400

46. Dokas I, Panagiotidis M, Papadamou S, et al. The determinants of energy and electricity consumption in developed and developing countries: International evidence. Energies. 2022; 15(7): 2558. doi: 10.3390/en15072558

47. Choi D, Eom J, Cho C. Integrating market and technology uncertainties into the projected cost of power technologies: A case of Korea. 2023; 45: 101046. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2022.101046

48. Le TH, Chang Y, Park D. Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, economic growth, and emissions: International evidence. The Energy Journal. 2020; 41(2): 73–92. doi: 10.5547/01956574.41.2.thle

49. Tariq G, Sun H, Haris M, et al. Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from four developing countries. 2018; 7(1): 100–107.

50. Ren X, Tong Z, Sun X, et al. Dynamic impacts of energy consumption on economic growth in China: Evidence from a non-parametric panel data model. 2022; 107: 105855. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105855

51. Yang X, Cui M. The effect of energy consumption on China’s regional economic growth from a spatial spillover perspective. Sustainability. 2022; 14: 9563. doi: 10.3390/su14159563

52. Barik R, Kayal P. Financial inclusion and electricity consumption: A cross-country analysis of higher-middle and lower-middle income countries. Energy Research Letters. 2025; 7(4): 1–6. doi: 10.46557/001c.142272

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Fitriadi, Darmawan, D., Darma, D. C., Rahmawati, & Romdoni, N. K. (2026). Macroeconomic variables affecting electricity consumption—A portrait of the capital city of Nusantara (IKN). Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest806