Comparative analysis of proactive tracking strategies for mobile PV systems: From discrete brute-force to continuous metaheuristic optimization

Authors

Ziyad Almajali1*  ID
Show Less
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan
Article ID: 822
67 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest822

Keywords:

solar electric vehicles; particle swarm optimization (PSO); proactive tracking; GPS trajectory; computational efficiency; renewable energy

Abstract

The efficiency of energy harvesting in Solar Electric Vehicles (SEVs) is significantly constrained by dynamic vehicle movement and the limited area of the roof. Conventional tracking techniques are often reactive, thus requiring substantial computing resources and causing high energy losses associated with constant changes. A new idea of a solar tracking system with a proactive approach, using both GPS trajectory data and Particle Swarm Optimization for the sake of optimizing the total net energy gain while minimizing computation, has been introduced in this study. In comparison with the exhaustive search approach, the journey is divided into proactive segments with the use of Particle Swarm Optimization within the dynamically varying search domain. In a simulation process done under the Python programming environment and considering the real trajectory of the path within a period of 10 h from Karak, Jordan, the PSO technique showed total energy gain amounting to 1,701.9 Wh. Even though there was only a minor improvement in terms of the total energy gained as compared with the benchmark values of energy gain (0.27%), the biggest advantage in this case can be seen in a computational decrease of 90% and 96% of the energy used by the embedded control device.

References

1. Li H, Hao Y, Xie C, et al. Emerging technologies and policies for carbon–neutral transportation. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. 2023; 12(1): 329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.09.002

2. Jankovec M, Brecl K, Bokalič M, et al. Monitoring solar irradiance and PV module performance in mobile applications. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2024; 277: 113101. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113101

3. Almajali Z. Optimizing Solar Car Performance: GPS-Enhanced Dual-Axis Precision and Single-Axis Southward Orientation in Solar Tracking Solutions. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology. 2025; 73(7). doi: 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I7P119

4. Lu N, Qin J. Global optimization of photovoltaic tilt angles: reducing solar power losses using reanalysis data. Environmental Research Letters. 2025; 20(3): 034054. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/adbb05

5. Sadeghi R, Parenti M, Memme S, et al. A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems. Energies. 2025; 18(10): 2553. doi: 10.3390/en18102553

6. Al Garni HZ, Awasthi A. Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy. 2017; 206: 1225–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024

7. Ku J, Kim SM, Park HD. Energy-saving path planning navigation for solar-powered vehicles considering shadows. Renewable Energy. 2024; 236: 121424. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121424

8. Xie Z, Wu Z. A flexible power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022; 49: 101747. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101747

9. Ding Z, Chen B, Zhang L, et al. Segment travel time route guidance strategy in advanced traveler information systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2019; 534: 120432. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.001

10. Roman CD. Routing Choices in Intelligent Transport Systems [PhD Thesis]. University of Warwick; 2021.

11. Mercorelli P. Techniques of Control for Energy Optimization in Actuators, Motors, and Power Generation Systems. Energies. 2025; 18(15): 4036. doi: 10.3390/en18154036

12. Nishanth JR, Deshmukh MA, Kushwah R, et al. Particle Swarm Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. In: Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering. IGI Global; 2023. pp. 291–308. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0044-2.ch016

13. Houssein EH, Gad AG, Hussain K, et al. Major Advances in Particle Swarm Optimization: Theory, Analysis, and Application. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 2021; 63: 100868. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100868

14. Gardashov ER, Gardashov RH, Eminov MSh, et al. Road-Based Simulation and Visualizations of Solar Car Motion. In: Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer; 2024. pp. 1–51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_182-1

15. Bouquet P, Jackson I, Nick M, et al. AI-based forecasting for optimised solar energy management and smart grid efficiency. International Journal of Production Research. 2024; 62(13): 4623–4644. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2269565

16. Bosques-Perez MA, Rishe N, Yan T, et al. Effects of Clouds and Shadows on the Use of Independent Component Analysis for Feature Extraction. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(15): 2632. doi: 10.3390/rs17152632

17. Dutton EG, Michalsky JJ, Stoffel T, et al. Measurement of Broadband Diffuse Solar Irradiance Using Current Commercial Instrumentation with a Correction for Thermal Offset Errors. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 2001; 18(3): 297–314. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018%3C0297:MOBDSI%3E2.0.CO;2

18. Ham AG, Nafornita C, Vesa VC, et al. Grid Search and Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Neural Networks for Automotive Radar Object Classification. Sensors. 2025; 25(19): 6017. doi: 10.3390/s25196017

19. Surianarayanan C, Lawrence JJ, Chelliah PR, et al. A Survey on Optimization Techniques for Edge Artificial Intelligence (AI). Sensors. 2023; 23(3): 1279. doi: 10.3390/s23031279

20. Abualigah L. Particle Swarm Optimization: Advances, Applications, and Experimental Insights. Computers, Materials & Continua. 2025; 82(2): 1539–1592. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.060765

21. Sohail MS, Saeed MOB, Rizvi SZ, et al. Low-Complexity Particle Swarm Optimization for Time-Critical Applications. 2014; doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1401.0546

22. De Melo Menezes BA, Kuchen H, De Lima Neto FB. Parallelization of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms: Literature Review. International Journal of Parallel Programming. 2022; 50(5–6): 486–514. doi: 10.1007/s10766-022-00736-3

23. Madhanakkumar N, Vijayaragavan M, Anbarasan P, et al. Smart energy management for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: Integration of waterwheel plant algorithm and dual stream spectrum deconvolution neural network. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024; 102: 113867. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.113867

24. Yao Y, Hu Y, Gao S, et al. A multipurpose dual-axis solar tracker with two tracking strategies. Renewable Energy. 2014; 72: 88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.002

25. Fedenko V, Dzundza B. Application of solar tracking systems for enhancing the energy yield of photovoltaic modules: a review. Technology and design in electronic equipment. 2025; (1–2): 27–33. doi: 10.15222/TKEA2025.1-2.27

Downloads

Published

2026-08-13

How to Cite

Almajali, Z. (2026). Comparative analysis of proactive tracking strategies for mobile PV systems: From discrete brute-force to continuous metaheuristic optimization . Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest822

Issue

Section

Article