Hydrogen storage in porous aluminosilicate ceramics and light-metal hydrides: Physisorption-chemisorption interplay

Authors

Muxammade-Sultanxan Paizullakhanov1*  ID,  Odiljon Rakhmatov2 ID,  Feruza Yusupova2 ID,  Nurmamat Umaraliev2 ID,  Sirojiddin Ergashev2 ID,  Shukhrat Sultonov2,  Umida Xusanova2 ID,  Shakhnozakhon Nazirjonova2 ID,  Zulayho Mavlyanova (Nabieva)2 ID,  Yan Yan3 ID,  Setora Usmanovna Turopova1 ID,  Umedjon Khalilov4,5 ID,  Odilhuja Parpiev1 ID
Show Less
1 Institute of Materials Sciences, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan
2 Department of Electronics and Instrumentation, Fergana State Technical University, Fergana 150100, Uzbekistan
3 School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243002, China
4 Arifov Institute of Ion-Plasma and Laser Technology, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan
5 Engineering School, Central Asian University, Tashkent 111221, Uzbekistan
Article ID: 830
172 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest830

Keywords:

hydrogen storage; porous aluminosilicate ceramics; metal hydrides; lithium hydride (LiH); chemisorption and physisorption; zeolite-type structure

Abstract

Efficient solid-state hydrogen storage remains a key challenge for hydrogen-based energy systems. In this work, porous aluminosilicate ceramics of the Al-SiO2 composition synthesized with combustible pore-forming additives and selected light-metal hydrides (LiH, TiH2, MgH2) were investigated as hydrogen storage media. The ceramics form a single-phase zeolite-type cubic structure with a = 4.056 Å and a hierarchical pore network (pore diameters 2–28 µm, porosity ≈ 44%) that supports gas transport. Hydrogenation experiments were performed in a high-temperature sealed reactor using gravimetric mass-gain measurements with explicit calibration, blank tests, and uncertainty analysis. Under optimal conditions (200 °C, 12 atm), the porous Al-SiO2 ceramics show a preliminary hydrogen storage capacity of up to 11 wt.% from mass-gain data, indicating strong potential but still requiring confirmation by standard P-C-T characterization. The storage mechanism combines physisorption on the porous framework with chemisorption and hydride-like phase formation (e.g., AlH3), and cyclic tests reveal noticeable structural degradation after about five sorption-desorption cycles. Comparative measurements show capacities of ≈0.7 wt.% for porous nickel, 1.5 wt.% for magnesium, 3.8 wt.% for titanium (near its 4.04 wt.% theoretical limit), and up to 12.4 wt.% for lithium at 700 °C and 12 atm, confirming the strong promise of porous aluminosilicates and light-metal hydrides for solid-state hydrogen storage.

References

1. Liu W, Tupe JA, Aguey‐Zinsou K. Metal Hydride Storage Systems: Approaches to Improve Their Performances. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. 2025; 42(3): 2400163. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.202400163

2. Sikiru S, Oladosu TL, Amosa TI, et al. Hydrogen-powered horizons: Transformative technologies in clean energy generation, distribution, and storage for sustainable innovation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024; 56: 1152–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.186

3. Patel SKS, Gupta RK, Rohit MV, et al. Recent Developments in Hydrogen Production, Storage, and Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives. Fire. 2024; 7(7): 233. doi: 10.3390/fire7070233

4. Beyazit Nİ. Comparative Study of Hydrogen Storage and Metal Hydride Systems: Future Energy Storage Solutions. Processes. 2025; 13(5): 1506. doi: 10.3390/pr13051506

5. Yue M, Lambert H, Pahon E, et al. Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 146: 111180. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111180

6. Li Y, Guo Q, Ding Z, et al. MOFs-Based Materials for Solid-State Hydrogen Storage: Strategies and Perspectives. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2024; 485: 149665. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.149665

7. Miao X, He J, Zhai H, et al. Adjustment the donor-acceptor COFs structure enhances the electron push-pull effect to induce electron transfer to Pt site and improve photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Carbon. 2025; 239: 120297. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120297

8. Alobaid A, Kamil M, Abdelrazek Khalil K. Metal hydrides for solid hydrogen storage: Experimental insights, suitability evaluation, and innovative technical considerations for stationary and mobile applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2025; 128: 432–456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.232

9. Wang W, Xu S, Li X, et al. Preparation and Hydrogen Absorption Kinetics Study of Hybrid Molding Metal Hydride Beds. Inorganics. 2026; 14(4): 110. doi: 10.3390/inorganics14040110

10. Minkina VG, Shabunya SI, Kalinin VI, et al. Hydrogen generation from sodium borohydride solutions for stationary applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016; 41(22): 9227–9233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.063

11. Pérez-Botella E, Valencia S, Rey F. Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews. 2022; 122(24): 17647–17695. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140

12. Bahmanzadegan F, Ghaemi A. A comprehensive review on novel zeolite-based adsorbents for environmental pollutant. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances. 2025; 17: 100617. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100617

13. Kordala N, Wyszkowski M. Zeolite Properties, Methods of Synthesis, and Selected Applications. Molecules. 2024; 29(5): 1069. doi: 10.3390/molecules29051069

14. Roth WJ, Gil B, Tarach KA, et al. Top-down engineering of zeolite porosity. Chemical Society Reviews. 2025; 54(16): 7484–7560. doi: 10.1039/D5CS00319A

15. Bai Y, Wagner G, Williams CB. Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Powder Packing and Sintering in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing of Metals. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2017; 139(8): 081019. doi: 10.1115/1.4036640

16. Ungár T. Microstructural parameters from X-ray diffraction peak broadening. Scripta Materialia. 2004; 51(8): 777–781. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.007

17. Balzar D. X-ray diffraction line broadening: modeling and applications to high-Tc superconductors. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 1993; 98(3): 321. doi: 10.6028/jres.098.026

18. Hong H, Guo H, Cui Z, et al. Structure modification of magnesium hydride for solid hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024; 78: 793–804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.327

19. Tayyab A, Shakil M, Ur Rehman N, et al. Exploring reversible hydrogen storage capacity of Li and Na metal-decorated Sc3N2 monolayer via DFT calculations. Journal of Energy Storage. 2025; 112: 115489. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.115489

20. Nemukula E, Mtshali CB, Nemangwele F. Metal Hydrides for Sustainable Hydrogen Storage: A Review. International Journal of Energy Research. 2025; 2025(1): 6300225. doi: 10.1155/er/6300225

21. Zhang S, Ma L, Liu W, et al. Solvent- and catalyst-free hydrogenation synthesis of lithium hydride at high altitude. Chemical Engineering Science. 2024; 295: 120158. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120158

22. U.S. Department of Energy. Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan: Planned Program Activities for 2003–2010. U.S. Department of Energy; 2003. Available online: https://docs.nlr.gov/docs/fy05osti/34289.pdf

23. Broom DP, Book D. Hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials. In: Advances in Hydrogen Production, Storage and Distribution. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 410–450. doi: 10.1533/9780857097736.3.410

24. Sifuentes A, Stowe AC, Smyrl N. Determination of the role of Li2O on the corrosion of lithium hydride. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2013; 580: S271–S273. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.02.046

25. Bahou S, Labrim H, Lakhal M, et al. Improving the hydrogen storage properties of lithium hydride (LiH) by lithium vacancy defects: Ab initio calculations. Solid State Communications. 2023; 371: 115167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2023.115167

26. Snider JL, Liu YS, Sawvel AM, et al. The influence of LiH and TiH2 on hydrogen storage in MgB2 I: Promotion of bulk hydrogenation at reduced temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022; 47(1): 387–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.169

27. Garlea E, King MO, Galloway EC, et al. Identification of lithium hydride and its hydrolysis products with neutron imaging. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2017; 485: 147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.012

Downloads

Published

2026-09-04

How to Cite

Paizullakhanov, M.-S., Rakhmatov, O., Yusupova, F., Umaraliev, N., Ergashev, S., Sultonov, S., Xusanova, U., Nazirjonova, S., Mavlyanova (Nabieva), Z., Yan, Y., Turopova, S. U., Khalilov, U., & Parpiev, O. (2026). Hydrogen storage in porous aluminosilicate ceramics and light-metal hydrides: Physisorption-chemisorption interplay. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest830