Electricity transition in Indonesia, ASEAN, and OECD nations, 1985–2024: Trends, gaps, and policy implications

Authors

Eka  Sudarmaji1*  ID,  Muhammad Rubiul Yatim1 ID,  Herlan1 ID,  Arya Jati Kusuma Al-ansori1 ID
Show Less
1 Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta 12630, Indonesia
Article ID: 869
45 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest869

Keywords:

renewable energy; energy transition; coal lock-in; ASEAN; OECD

Abstract

This study examines why Indonesia's renewable energy transition has stalled relative to its ASEAN neighbors and OECD nations, despite the country holding substantial hydro, solar, and geothermal resources. Using comparative quantitative analysis of electricity generation data from 1985 to 2024, we track renewable energy integration trends across three groups: Indonesia, the ASEAN regional average, and OECD countries. The analysis combines descriptive statistics, trend assessment, and scenario-based modeling to project trajectories through 2040. Results reveal a persistent transition gap: OECD countries reached renewable shares above 40% by 2024, ASEAN averaged 28.3%, and Indonesia remained below 16%—even as coal held more than 55% of its generation mix throughout the study period. Three structural factors are consistently associated with this gap: fossil fuel infrastructure lock-in reinforced by a domestic coal price cap that renders renewables artificially uncompetitive, weak investment mobilization relative to OECD-style feed-in tariffs and carbon pricing mechanisms, and fragmented regulatory frameworks that systematically inflate project risk. Scenario modeling shows that business-as-usual sustains high emissions, while a coal phase-down combined with renewable acceleration could push the renewable share to 40–50% by 2040. Closing this gap requires coordinated reform: redirecting fossil fuel subsidies to renewables, streamlining licensing, guaranteeing grid access, and deepening ASEAN regional power trading. The findings carry direct relevance for other middle-income, coal-dependent countries managing the tension between energy transition and economic growth.

References

1. Shovon MSS, Gomes CA, Reza SA, et al. Forecasting Renewable Energy Trends in the USA: An AI-Driven Analysis of Electricity Production by Source. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2025; 4(3): 322–345. doi: 10.62754/joe.v4i3.6696

2. Duff DG, Green AJ. Market-Based Policies For Renewable Energy Source Electricity: A Comparative Evaluation. In: Critical Issues In Environmental Taxation. Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 825–853. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199542185.003.0035

3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Effective Carbon Rates 2023: Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Taxes and Emissions Trading, OECD Series on Carbon Pricing and Energy Taxation. OECD Publishing; 2023. doi: 10.1787/b84d5b36-en

4. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024. IRENA; 2025. Available online: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Jul/IRENA_TEC_RPGC_in_2024_2025.pdf

5. Wong R, Dewayanti A. Indonesiaʼs energy transition: Dependency, subsidies and renewables. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. 2024; 11(2): e391. doi: 10.1002/app5.391

6. Sambodo MT, Yuliana CI, Hidayat S, et al. Breaking barriers to low-carbon development in Indonesia: deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon. 2022; 8(4): e09304. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09304

7. Sekaringtias A, Verrier B, Cronin J. Untangling the socio-political knots: A systems view on Indonesia’s inclusive energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023; 95: 102911. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102911

8. International Energy Agency (IEA). Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2024. IEA; 2024. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2024

9. Paiboonsin P, Oluleye G, Howells M, et al. Pathways to Clean Energy Transition in Indonesia’s Electricity Sector with Open-Source Energy Modelling System Modelling (OSeMOSYS). Energies. 2023; 17(1): 75. doi: 10.3390/en17010075

10. Tulkinov S. Forecast of Electricity Production from Coal and Renewable Sources in Major European Economies. Preprint. 2023. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2621637/v1

11. Asratie TM. Determinants of electricity production from renewable source excluding hydroelectricity in selected East African countries: Panel ARDL approach. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2022; 10(1): 2080897. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2080897

12. Maulidia M, Dargusch P, Ashworth P, et al. Rethinking renewable energy targets and electricity sector reform in Indonesia: A private sector perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019; 101: 231–247. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.005

13. Massagony A, Pandit R, White B. Political economy of energy policy in Indonesia towards net zero emissions by 2060. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2025; 88: 101757. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101757

14. Gunawan G. Decarbonizing Indonesia’s power system: exploring the potential of energy storage systems for a sustainable energy transition. Renewable Energy Focus. 2025; 54: 100722. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2025.100722

15. International Energy Agency (IEA). Data and Statistics. IEA; 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics

16. World Bank. World Development Indicators. World Bank; 2023. Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

17. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. IRENA; 2024. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Sep/Renewable-power-generation-costs-in-2023

18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Environmental Policy: Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariffs (Edition 2021). OECD Environment Statistics; 2022

19. Herczeg B, Pintér É. The Nexus between Wholesale Electricity Prices and the Share of Electricity Production from Renewables: An Analysis with and without the Impact of Time of Distress. Energies. 2024; 17(4): 857. doi: 10.3390/en17040857

20. Kost C, Shivenes Shammugam, Fluri V, et al. Levelized Cost of Electricity: Renewable Energy Technologies (Version 2021). Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE; 2021. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22457.08800

21. Rahil A, Gammon R. Dispatchable Hydrogen Production at the Forecourt for Electricity Demand Shaping. Sustainability. 2017; 9(10): 1785. doi: 10.3390/su9101785

22. Yalılı M, Menlik T, Boran FE. Assessment of Multi-Source Electricity Production Regulation in Türkiye Based on Capacity Constraints and Realizations. Politeknik Dergisi. 2025; 28(6): 1801–1813. doi: 10.2339/politeknik.1521114

23. McKenna J, Thomson M. Impact of wind curtailment and storage on the Irish power system 2020 renewable electricity targets: a free open-source electricity system balancing and market (ESBM) model. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014); 24–25 September 2014; Naples, Italy. doi: 10.1049/cp.2014.0845

24. Zhong S, Yang L, Papageorgiou DJ, et al. Accelerating ASEAN’s energy transition in the power sector through cross-border transmission and a net-zero 2050 view. iScience. 2025; 28(1): 111547. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111547

25. Septiyanto JN. Hydrogen Generator Design Using Motorcycle Electricity Source. Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technology. 2025; 6(1): 69–81. doi: 10.31284/j.jasmet.2025.v6i1.7428

26. Shah KU, Raghoo P, Blechinger P. Is there a case for a coal moratorium in Indonesia? Power sector optimization modeling of low-carbon strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition. 2024; 5: 100074. doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2023.100074

27. Salam MC, Kural O, Harmiyati H, et al. Toward a just and robust energy transition in Indonesia: A multi-scale, multi-dimensional assessment of coal moratorium and renewable energy integration. Environmental Research. 2026; 300: 124447. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2026.124447

28. Boz DE, Sanli B, Berument MH. The effects of cross-border electricity trade on power production from different energy sources. The Electricity Journal. 2021; 34(5): 106953. doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2021.106953

29. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.

30. Ember. Yearly Electricity Data. Ember; 2023. Available online: https://ember-climate.org/data-catalogue/yearly-electricity-data/

31. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Sudarmaji, E., Yatim, M. R., Herlan, & Al-ansori, A. J. K. (2026). Electricity transition in Indonesia, ASEAN, and OECD nations, 1985–2024: Trends, gaps, and policy implications. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest869