Parametric study of the geometry of a solar chimney power plant in Peru using computational fluid dynamics

Authors

Rodolfo Garcia Uchofen1 ID,  Alberto Hananel1*  ID,  Alejandro Vera Lázaro1 ID
Show Less
1 Department of Engineering, Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo Catholic University, Chiclayo 14001, Peru
Article ID: 872
89 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest872

Keywords:

computational fluid dynamics; parametric analysis; renewable energy; simulation; solar chimney; solar energy

Abstract

Solar Chimney Power Plants (SCPPs) are emerging renewable-energy systems that convert solar radiation into electrical energy through buoyancy-driven airflow. Despite recent advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling of SCPPs, studies employing fully three-dimensional parametric analyses under South American high-irradiance conditions remain limited. This study presents one of the first three-dimensional parametric CFD analyses of solar chimney geometry optimization under the climatic conditions of Olmos, Peru. Unlike conventional two-dimensional or axisymmetric approaches, the present methodology employs a fully three-dimensional CFD framework capable of capturing complex airflow behavior, thermal asymmetries, localized recirculation, and pressure-recovery mechanisms associated with divergent chimney geometries. Four chimney configurations were evaluated: cylindrical, divergent, vertical-to-divergent, and divergent-to-vertical. The results indicate that the divergent-to-vertical configuration exhibited the best overall aerodynamic performance, achieving the highest airflow velocity and predicted power output while maintaining stable flow behavior without significant recirculation regions. The improved performance was associated with enhanced basal acceleration and more effective pressure recovery within the chimney. The findings demonstrate the aerodynamic advantages of divergent chimney configurations under high-irradiance operating conditions and provide a technical framework for the future development and optimization of SCPP systems in regions with strong solar-resource potential.

References

1. Agency IE. World Energy Outlook 2019. International Energy Agency; 2019. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019

2. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/

3. Sharon H. A detailed review on sole and hybrid solar chimney based sustainable ventilation, power generation, and potable water production systems. Energy Nexus. 2023; 10: 100184. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100184

4. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available online: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/economics-of-climate-change/A1E0BBF2F0ED8E2E4142A9C878052204

5. United Nations. The Paris Agreement. In: Proceedings of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21); 12 December 2015; Paris, France. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement

6. Kasaeian AB, Molana S, Rahmani K, et al. A review on solar chimney systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 67: 954–987. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.081

7. Bayareh M. Exergy analysis of solar chimney power plants: A review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022; 53: 102568. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102568

8. Schlaich J, Bergermann R, Schiel W, et al. Design of Commercial Solar Updraft Tower Systems—Utilization of Solar Induced Convective Flows for Power Generation. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 2005; 127(1): 117–124. doi: 10.1115/1.1823493

9. Haaf W, Friedrich K, Mayr G, et al. Solar Chimneys Part I: Principle and construction of the pilot plant in Manzanares. International Journal of solar energy. 1983; 2(1): 3–20. doi: 10.1080/01425918308909911

10. Haaf W. Solar Chimneys Part II: Preliminary test results from the Manzanares pilot plant. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 1984; 2(2): 141–161. doi: 10.1080/01425918408909921

11. Bagheri S, Hassanabad MG. Numerical and experimental investigation of a novel vertical solar chimney power plant for renewable energy production in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2023; 96: 104700. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104700

12. Vieira RS, Petry AP, Rocha LAO, et al. Numerical evaluation of a solar chimney geometry for different ground temperatures by means of constructal design. Renewable Energy. 2017; 109: 222–234. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.007

13. Mebarki A, Sekhri A, Assassi A, et al. CFD analysis of solar chimney power plant: Finding a relationship between model minimization and its performance for use in urban areas. Energy Reports. 2022; 8: 500–513. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.008

14. Murena F, Gaggiano I, Mele B. Fluid dynamic performances of a solar chimney plant: Analysis of experimental data and CFD modelling. Energy. 2022; 249: 123702. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123702

15. Cuce E, Cuce PM, Sen H. A thorough performance assessment of solar chimney power plants: Case study for Manzanares. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2020; 1: 100026. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2020.100026

16. Li JY, Guo PH, Wang Y. Effects of collector radius and chimney height on power output of a solar chimney power plant with turbines. Renewable Energy. 2012; 47: 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.018

17. Fasel HF, Meng F, Shams E, et al. CFD analysis for solar chimney power plants. Solar Energy. 2013; 98: 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.029

18. Mullett LB. The solar chimney—overall efficiency, design and performance. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 1987; 8(1): 35–40. doi: 10.1080/01430750.1987.9675512

19. Araya HG, Teferi ST. Performance comparison of cylindrical and diverging solar chimney power plants. Results in Engineering. 2025; 26: 105485. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105485

20. Cuce PM, Cuce E, Mandal DK, et al. ANN and CFD driven research on main performance characteristics of solar chimney power plants: Impact of chimney and collector angle. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2024; 60: 104568. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104568

21. Mandal DK, Gupta KK, Biswas N, et al. Optimization of hybrid solar chimney power plants (HSCPPs): A review of multi-objective approaches. Applied Energy. 2025; 396: 126214. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126214

22. Saleh MJ, Atallah FS, Algburi S, et al. Enhancement methods of the performance of a solar chimney power plant: Review. Results in Engineering. 2023; 19: 101375. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101375

23. Abo-Zahhad EM, Hachicha AA, Mistarihi MZ, et al. Optimization of ground material properties for enhanced solar chimney power plant efficiency: A CFD and RSM approach. Energy Reports. 2025; 13: 3929–3945. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.03.035

24. Arefian A, Hosseini-Abardeh R, Rahimi-Larki M, et al. A comprehensive analysis of time-dependent performance of a solar chimney power plant equipped with a thermal energy storage system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024; 189: 114051. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114051

25. Xu Y, Zhou X. Performance of divergent-chimney solar power plants. Solar Energy. 2018; 170: 379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.068

26. Global Solar Atlas. Release Notes. Available online: https://globalsolaratlas.info/support/release-notes (accessed on 25 March 2024).

27. Bejan A. Convection Heat Transfer. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

28. Abdelmohimen MAH, Algarni SA. Numerical investigation of solar chimney power plants performance for Saudi Arabia weather conditions. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018; 38: 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.013

29. ANSYS Inc. Ansys Fluent Theory Guide. ANSYS Inc.; 2021.

30. Government of Canada. RETScreen Expert. Natural Resources Canada, Government of Canada; 2026. Available online: https://natural-resources.canada.ca/maps-tools-publications/tools-applications/retscreen

31. Nizetic S, Ninic N, Klarin B. Analysis and feasibility of implementing solar chimney power plants in the Mediterranean region. Energy. 2008; 33(11): 1680–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.05.012

32. Ferziger JH, Perić M, Street RL. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 4th ed. Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99693-6

33. Jubayer CM, Siddiqui K, Hangan H. CFD analysis of convective heat transfer from ground mounted solar panels. Solar Energy. 2016; 133: 556–566. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.027

34. Zhu L, Khdair AI, Aghaei A, et al. A comprehensive review of solar chimney power plants: technology, performance, and future prospects. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2025; 81: 104413. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2025.104413

35. Singh T, Kumar A. Numerical analysis of the divergent solar chimney power plant with a novel arc and fillet radius at the chimney base region. Renewable Energy. 2024; 228(3): 120504.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11

How to Cite

Garcia Uchofen, R., Hananel, A., & Vera Lázaro, A. (2026). Parametric study of the geometry of a solar chimney power plant in Peru using computational fluid dynamics. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest872