Economic and institutional drivers of renewable energy adoption: A cross-country panel analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18686/cest949Keywords:
renewable electricity; energy transition; RISE; institutional environment; RDGI; fossil fuel inertia; solar generation; wind generationAbstract
This article identifies the economic and institutional factors driving cross-country differences in renewable energy adoption, focusing on solar and wind power. Unlike previous studies that either compare the share of renewable energy sources or analyze individual support policies, we propose the Renewable Deployment Gap Index (RDGI), an indicator which captures the gap between actual renewable deployment and the level expected under given resource, macroeconomic, and regulatory conditions. The empirical analysis is based on a panel dataset of countries spanning 2010–2023. The methodology includes country- and year-fixed effects models, a dynamic specification with a lagged dependent variable, and a counterfactual scenario in which regulatory quality is improved to the level of leading countries. The results indicate that the most persistent barrier is fossil fuel inertia in the electricity sector: a higher share of fossil-fuel-based generation is statistically associated with a lower share of renewables (excluding hydropower) and a lower share of solar and wind generation specifically. The Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy (RISE) tool exhibits stronger explanatory power across countries than within-country short-term dynamics. The counterfactual analysis suggests that if countries below the 90th percentile of the RISE distribution were to raise their regulatory quality to the level of top performers, the expected share of solar and wind generation would increase by approximately 11.9 percentage points on average. These findings underscore the importance of grid access reforms, competitive auctions, long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs), streamlined permitting procedures, and mechanisms to mitigate investment risk.
References
1. Carley S. State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness. Energy Policy. 2009; 37(8): 3071–3081.
2. Suzuki M, Jewell J, Cherp A. Have Climate Policies Accelerated Energy Transitions? Historical Evolution of Electricity Mix in the G7 and the EU Compared to Net-Zero Targets. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023; 106: 103281. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103281
3. Way R, Ives M, Mealy P, et al. Empirically Grounded Technology Forecasts and the Energy Transition. Joule. 2022; 6(9): 2057–2082. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009
4. Eyraud L, Wane A, Zhang C, et al. Who’s Going Green and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment. IMF Working Papers. 2011; 2011(296). doi: 10.5089/9781463927301.001
5. Polzin F, Migendt M, Täube F, et al. Public Policy Influence on Renewable Energy Investments —A Longitudinal Study Across OECD Countries. Energy Policy. 2014; 80: 98–111. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2423310
6. Aklin M, Urpelainen J. Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions. American Journal of Political Science. 2013; 57(3): 643–658.
7. Apergis N, Payne JE. Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. Energy Policy. 2010; 38(1): 656–660.
8. Chen C, Pinar M, Stengos T. Determinants of Renewable Energy Consumption: Importance of Democratic Institutions. Renewable Energy. 2021; 179: 75–83.
9. Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2009; 45: 133–155. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
10. Meckling J, Galeazzi C, Shears E, et al. Energy Innovation Funding and Institutions in Major Economies. Nature Energy. 2022; 7: 876–885. doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01117-3
11. Breyer C, Khalili S, Bogdanov D, et al. On the History and Future of 100% Renewable Energy Systems Research. IEEE Access. 2022; 10: 78176–78218. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193402
12. Sebestyén V. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Environmental Impact Networks of Renewable Energy Power Plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 151: 111626. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111626
13. Kilinc-Ata N. The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Policies across EU Countries and US States: An Econometric Approach. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2016; 31: 83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2015.12.006
14. Menz FC, Vachon S. The Effectiveness of Different Policy Regimes for Promoting Wind Power: Experiences from the States. Energy Policy. 2006; 34(14): 1786–1796.
15. Popp D, Haščič I, Medhi N, et al. Technology and the Diffusion of Renewable Energy. Energy Economics. 2011; 33(4): 648–662.
16. Nesta L, Vona F, Nicolli F. Environmental Policies, Competition and Innovation in Renewable Energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2014; 67(3): 396–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001
17. Nicolli F, Vona F. Heterogeneous Policies, Heterogeneous Technologies: The Case of Renewable Energy. Energy Economics. 2016; 56: 190–204.
18. Cadoret I, Padovano F. The Political Drivers of Renewable Energies Policies. Energy Economics. 2016; 56: 261–269.
19. Lebedev A, Cherepovitsyn A, Tsvetkov P. A cluster-based circular economy model for drilling waste processing in oil and gas regions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 28: 190. doi: 10.1007/s10098-026-03544-2
20. Dolphin G, Xiahou Q. World Carbon Pricing Database: Sources and Methods. Scientific Data. 2022; 9: 573. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01659-x
21. Dolphin G, Merkle M. Emissions-Weighted Carbon Price: Sources and Methods. Scientific Data. 2024; 11: 1017. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03121-6
22. Davis NN, Badger J, Hahmann AN, et al. The Global Wind Atlas: A High-Resolution Dataset of Climatologies and Associated Web-Based Application. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2023; 104: E1507–E1525. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0075.1
23. Maksimova RI, Sizyakov VM, Brichkin VN, et al. Recycling of the Lime Component in the Complex Processing of Alkaline Aluminosilicates. Obogashchenie Rud. 2026; 45–54. doi: 10.17580/or.2026.02.07 (in Russian)
24. Nevskaya MA, Raikhlin SM, Chanysheva AF. Assessment of Energy Efficiency Projects at Russian Mining Enterprises within the Framework of Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17): 7478. doi: 10.3390/su16177478
25. Dmitrieva D, Chanysheva A, Solovyova V. A Conceptual Model for the Sustainable Development of the Arctic’s Mineral Resources Considering Current Global Trends: Future Scenarios, Key Actors, and Recommendations. Resources. 2023; 12(6): 63. doi: 10.3390/resources12060063
26. Kongar-Syuryun CB, Aleksakhin AV, Eliseeva EN, et al. Modern Technologies Providing a Full Cycle of Geo-Resources Development. Resources. 2023; 12(4): 50. doi: 10.3390/resources12040050
27. Shpenst VA, Belsky AA, Orel EA. Improving the Efficiency of Autonomous Electrical Complex with Renewable Energy Sources by Means of Adaptive Regulation of Its Operating Modes. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023; 261: 479–492.
28. Skamyin AN, Dobush VS, Jopri MH. Determination of the Grid Impedance in Power Consumption Modes with Harmonics. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023; 261: 443–454. doi: 10.31897/PMI.2023.25
29. Samylovskaya E, Makhovikov A, Lutonin A, et al. Digital Technologies in Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Extraction: Global Trends and Russian Experience. Resources. 2022; 11(3): 29. doi: 10.3390/resources11030029
30. Dvoynikov M, Buslaev G, Kunshin A, et al. New Concepts of Hydrogen Production and Storage in Arctic Region. Resources. 2021; 10(1): 3. doi: 10.3390/resources10010003
31. Prischepa O, Nefedov Y, Nikiforova V. Arctic Shelf Oil and Gas Prospects from Lower-Middle Paleozoic Sediments of the Timan–Pechora Oil and Gas Province Based on the Results of a Regional Study. Resources. 2021; 11(1): 3. doi: 10.3390/resources11010003
32. Andreichyk A, Tsvetkov P. Study of the Relationship between Economic Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries on the Basis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Resources. 2023; 12(7): 80. doi: 10.3390/resources12070080
33. Zhukovskiy YL, Beloglazov II, Klebanov DA, et al. Editorial: Digital Transformation in Process and Equipment Management at Fuel and Energy Complex and Mineral Resources Companies. Journal of Mining Institute. 2025; 275: 3–4.
34. Sovacool BK. How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 2016; 13: 202–215. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020
35. Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ, et al. Array Programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585: 357–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
36. Colin Cameron A, Miller DL. A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference. Journal of Human Resources. 2015; 50(2): 317–372. doi: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Semyon Maksimovich Raikhlin, Natalia Nikolaevna Trofimova, Alena Nikolaevna Martemyanova, Elena Ivanovna Stepuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
.jpg)
