Numerical investigation of laminar hydrogen combustion across multiple flame configurations under pressure and strain effects

Authors

Amr Abbass1* 
Show Less
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville 39762, Mississippi State, USA
Article ID: 525
476 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest525

Keywords:

combustion; hydrogen; laminar; flames; Cantera

Abstract

This research quantitatively examines laminar hydrogen combustion under diverse pressure and strain conditions, employing comprehensive chemical kinetics in Cantera 3.0 with the H2–O2 and GRI-Mech 3.0 mechanisms. To learn more about flame speed, structure, and extinction behavior, we looked at four main flame configurations: freely propagating premixed, counterflow diffusion, premixed counterflow, and stagnation-point flames. The laminar flame speed of pure hydrogen was 310 cm/s, which means it burned very quickly because it spread out quickly. Hydrogen stayed stable up to a strain rate of 6.0 × 105 s–1 before it went out. The peak flame temperature dropped from 3600 K to 3000 K when the pressure rose from 1 bar to 100 bar. This shows that higher pressure makes things more stable but less heat is released. The innovation of this study resides in the integration of all principal flame configurations into a cohesive modeling framework, demonstrating that strain rate exerts a more significant impact on flame collapse than pressure. These results give us a baseline for designing efficient turbines, rocket combustors, and industrial heating systems that run on hydrogen.

References

1. Shchepakina EA, Zubrilin IA, Kuznetsov AY, et al. Physical and chemical features of hydrogen combustion and their influence on the characteristics of gas turbine combustion chambers. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(6): 3754. doi: 10.3390/app13063754

2. Giacomazzi E, Troiani G, Di Nardo A, et al. Hydrogen combustion: Features and barriers to its exploitation in the energy transition. Energies. 2023; 16(20): 7174. doi: 10.3390/en16207174

3. Jeon J, Kim SJ. Recent progress in hydrogen flammability prediction for the safe energy systems. Energies. 2020; 13(23): 6263. doi: 10.3390/en13236263

4. Calabrese M, Portarapillo M, Di Nardo A, et al. Hydrogen safety challenges: a comprehensive review on production, storage, transport, utilization, and CFD-based consequence and risk assessment. Energies. 2024; 17(6): 1350. doi: 10.3390/en17061350

5. Yip HL, Srna A, Yuen ACY, et al. A review of hydrogen direct injection for internal combustion engines: towards carbon-free combustion. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(22): 4842. doi: 10.3390/app9224842

6. Lan H, Wang G, Zhao K, et al. Review on the hydrogen dispersion and the burning behavior of fuel cell electric vehicles. Energies. 2022; 15(19): 7295. doi: 10.3390/en15197295

7. Mehdi G, De Giorgi MG, Bonuso S, et al. Comparative analysis of flame propagation and flammability limits of CH4/H2/air mixture with or without nanosecond plasma discharges. Aerospace. 2023; 10(3): 224. doi: 10.3390/aerospace10030224

8. Ricci F, Zembi J, Avana M, et al. Analysis of hydrogen combustion in a spark ignition research engine with a barrier discharge igniter. Energies. 2024; 17(7): 1739. doi: 10.3390/en17071739

9. Habib MA, Abdulrahman GAQ, Alquaity ABS, et al. Hydrogen combustion, production, and applications: A review. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2024; 100: 182-207. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.030

10. Han W, Dai P, Gou X, et al. A review of laminar flame speeds of hydrogen and syngas measured from propagating spherical flames. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science. 2020; 1: 100008. doi: 10.1016/j.jaecs.2020.100008

11. Sánchez AL, Williams FA. Recent advances in understanding of flammability characteristics of hydrogen. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2014; 41: 1-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2013.10.002

12. Ravi S, Petersen EL. Laminar flame speed correlations for pure-hydrogen and high-hydrogen content syngas blends with various diluents. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37(24): 19177-19189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.086

13. Kuznetsov M, Redlinger R, Breitung W, et al. Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen-oxygen-steam mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2011; 33(1): 895-903. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.050

14. Burke MP, Chaos M, Dryer FL, et al. Negative pressure dependence of mass burning rates of H2/CO/O2/diluent flames at low flame temperatures. Combustion and Flame. 2010; 157(4): 618-631. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.08.009

15. Pfahl UJ, Ross MC, Shepherd JE, et al. Flammability limits, ignition energy, and flame speeds in H2–CH4–NH3–N2O–O2–N2 mixtures. Combustion and Flame. 2000; 123(1-2): 140-158. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00152-8

16. Butler MS, Moran CW, Sunderland PB, et al. Limits for hydrogen leaks that can support stable flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34(12): 5174-5182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.012

17. Song W, Dave H, Im HG, et al. Local flame displacement speeds of hydrogen-air premixed flames in moderate to intense turbulence. Combustion and Flame. 2022; 236: 111812. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111812

18. Yilmaz H, Schröder L, Hillenbrand T, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on combustion and flame propagation characteristics of laser ignited methane/air mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023; 48(45): 17324-17338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.224

19. El-Ghafour SAA, El-Dein AHE, Aref AAR. Combustion characteristics of natural gas–hydrogen hybrid fuel turbulent diffusion flame. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35(6): 2556-2565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.049

20. Amez I, Paredes R, León D, et al. New Experimental Approaches for the Determination of Flammability Limits in Methane–Hydrogen Mixtures with CO2 Inertization Using the Spark Test Apparatus. Fire. 2024; 7(11): 403. doi: 10.3390/fire7110403

21. Nemitallah MA, Habib MA, Abdelhafez A. Hydrogen for Clean Energy Production: Combustion Fundamentals and Applications. Springer Nature; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-7925-3

22. Kumar S, Agarwal AK, Khandelwal B, Singh P (editors). Introduction to Ammonia and Hydrogen for Green Energy Transition. In: Ammonia and Hydrogen for Green Energy Transition. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Springer; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-0507-8_1

23. Das LM. Hydrogen Engines: Design, Performance Evaluation, Combustion Analysis, and Exhaust Emissions. John Wiley & Sons; 2024.

24. Gelfand BE, Silnikov MV, Medvedev SP, et al. Thermo-Gas Dynamics of Hydrogen Combustion and Explosion. Springer; 2012.

25. Tingas EA (editor). Hydrogen for Future Thermal Engines. Springer; 2023.

26. Alverà M. The Hydrogen Revolution: A Blueprint for the Future of Clean Energy. Hodder & Stoughton; 2022.

27. Glassman I, Yetter RA, Glumac NG. Combustion, 5th ed. Elsevier; 2014.

28. Turns SR. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2021.

29. Goodwin DG, Moffat HK, Schoegl I, et al. Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/14455267 (accessed on 1 December 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Abbass, A. (2025). Numerical investigation of laminar hydrogen combustion across multiple flame configurations under pressure and strain effects. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(1), 525. https://doi.org/10.18686/cest525

Issue

Section

Article