Decarbonizing road infrastructure: A framework for adopting energy-efficient pavement technologies in Thailand

Authors

  • Disayapat Pakdeearporn Graduate School of Service Innovation and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Hospitality Industry, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
  • Danupon Sangnak Graduate School of Service Innovation and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Hospitality Industry, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
Article ID: 571
96 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest571

Keywords:

green road technologies; decarbonization; road infrastructure; energy efficiency; policy-implementation gap

Abstract

This study develops and empirically validates a comprehensive framework to explain the factors influencing the adoption of Green Road Technologies (GRTs) in Thailand’s road construction industry, a critical component of the nation’s 2050 carbon-neutrality goal. Despite supportive government policies, a significant implementation gap hinders widespread adoption of GRT. To diagnose this issue, we employ an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAL → QUAN), where insights from 15 in-depth interviews with senior industry stakeholders directly informed the development of a quantitative model. Phase 2 involves a survey of 350 construction professionals, with the data analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The scientific novelty of this research lies in its extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), which differs from prior studies by integrating macro-level (Governmental Policy & Incentives) and meso-level (Top Management Support) structural drivers to adapt the model for a capital-intensive, non-IT industry in a developing economy. The model demonstrates high explanatory power (R2 = 68.7%), indicating that Governmental Policy & Incentives (β = 0.351) and Top Management Support (β = 0.283) are the strongest drivers of behavioral intention. Perceived Economic Viability and Performance Expectancy were also significant, whereas Effort Expectancy was not, reflecting the unique professional culture of the engineering sector. The primary theoretical contribution is an empirically validated, multi-level framework that integrates policy, organizational, and individual factors, offering a nuanced understanding of technology adoption beyond traditional models. Practically, the findings provide a clear roadmap for stakeholders to bridge the policy-implementation gap and accelerate infrastructure decarbonization.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Pakdeearporn, D., & Sangnak, D. (2026). Decarbonizing road infrastructure: A framework for adopting energy-efficient pavement technologies in Thailand. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest571

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Disayapat Pakdeearporn, Danupon Sangnak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

1. Kang S, Yang R, Ozer H, et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gases and energy consumption for material and construction phases of pavement with traffic delay. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2014; 2428(1): 27–34. doi: 10.3141/2428-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2428-04

2. Wang T, Lee IS, Kendall A, et al. Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012; 33: 86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.001

3. Abey ST, Kolathayar S. Embodied energy and carbon emissions of pavements: A review. In: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer; 2019. pp. 167–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7557-6_14

4. Lah, O. Factors of Change: The influence of policy environment factors on climate change mitigation strategies in the transport sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017; 25, 3495-3510. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.265

5. Miliutenko S. Life cycle impacts of road infrastructure: Case study for Sweden. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012. 2287(1): 112–119. doi: 10.3141/2287-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2287-13

6. Xia Q, Hua D, Shi Y, et al. Unveiling the dislocation mechanism induced by irradiation defects in austenitic FeCrNi alloy. International Journal of Plasticity. 2025; 193: 104451. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2025.104451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2025.104451

7. Ye W, Xie M, Zhou Q, et al. Superior wear performance of CoCrNi matrix composite reinforced with quasi-continuously networked graphene nanosheets and in-situ carbide. Friction. 2025; 13(8): 9441001. doi: 10.26599/frict.2025.9441001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2025.9441001

8. Hua D, Xia Q, Li J, et al. Atomistic simulation of the interactions of radiation damage and grain boundaries in austenitic FeCrNi alloy. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2026; 618: 156234. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.156234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.156234

9. Rudman CE, Jenkins KJ. Sustainable road construction practice in a developing country: A South African perspective. Sustainable Construction Materials 2012. 2012. pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1061/9780784412671.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412671.0001

10. Kumar R, Rao GA, Ryntathiang TL. Green road approach in Indian road construction for the sustainable development. In: Sustainable Infrastructure Development. Springer; 2018. pp. 107–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74494-0_8

11. Wu P, Xia B, Zhao X, et al. Defining green road infrastructure projects: A critical review. In Sustainable Construction and Design. Springer. 2015; pp. 125–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46994-1_11

12. Chan S, Bennett B, Kazmierowski T. Implementation of ontario's pavement sustainability rating system - greenpave. airfield and highway pavement 2013. 2013. pp. 22–29. doi: 10.1061/9780784413005.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413005.003

13. Condurat M, Condurat M, Ionita G. The environmental performances of reclaimed asphalt and bituminous sand pavements for transition toward low carbon mobility. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2018; 21(4): 50–62. doi: 10.5755/j01.sace.21.4.18486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.21.4.18486

14. Yaro NSA, Sutanto MH, Baloo L, et al. A comprehensive overview of the utilization of recycled waste materials and technologies in asphalt pavements: Towards environmental and sustainable low-carbon roads. Processes. 2023; 11(7): 2095. doi: 10.3390/pr110720951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072095

15. Baek J, Hu H, et al. Estimating carbon reductions of green highway technologies. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 2015; 6(10): 775–780. doi: 10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.697

16. Pantelidou H, Nicholson D, Hughes L, et al. Application of carbon calculators to estimate carbon dioxide emissions reduction in road construction projects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012; 2287(1): 93–101. doi: 10.3141/2287-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2287-11

17. Limmeechokchai B, Lorm R. Scenario-based assessment of decarbonized transport sector in Thailand towards carbon neutrality 2050. International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology (BUILT). 2024; 22(2): 256385. doi: 10.56261/built.v22.256385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56261/built.v22.256385

18. Limmeechokchai B, Bahadur Pradhan B, Chunark P, et al. Energy system transformation for attainability of net zero emissions in Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management. 2022; 35: 27–44. doi: 10.54337/ijsepm.7116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7116

19. Chotichanathawewong Q. On the dynamics of low carbon green growth in Thailand. In Low-Carbon Green Growth in Asia. Springer; 2016. pp. 131–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0761-3_6

20. Limmeechokchai B, Winyuchakrit P, Pita P, et al. Decarbonizing Transport Sector in Thailand Towards 2050. 2022 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Energy, Environment and Climate Change (ICUE). IEEE. 2022; 1–7. doi: 10.1109/icue55325.2022.10113536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUE55325.2022.10113536

21. Hoy M, Horpibulsuk S, Rachan R, et al. Recycled asphalt pavement–fly ash geopolymers as a sustainable pavement base material: Strength and toxic leaching investigations. Science of The Total Environment. 2016; 573: 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.078

22. Kokkaew N, Rudjanakanoknad J. Green assessment of Thailand's highway infrastructure: A Green Growth Index approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017; 21(7): 2526–2537. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-0923-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0923-0

23. Babon-Ayeng P, Kissi E, Tannor RA, et al. Critical success factors (CSFs) for the adoption of green construction concepts in road construction in Ghana. International Journal of Construction Management. 2022; 24(13): 1465–1474. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2131122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2131122

24. Huang Y, Parry T. Pavement life cycle assessment. In: Sustainable Construction Materials. Springer; 2014. pp. 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44719-2_1

25. Chen J, Yu Z, Chen G, et al. Evaluation of policy instruments for promoting green transportation in developing countries. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3): 1122. doi: 10.3390/su13031122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031122

26. Kongklaew C, Phoungthong K, Prabpayak C, et al. Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22): 12839. doi: 10.3390/su132212839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212839

27. Vithayaporn S, Nitivattananon V, Sasaki N, et al. Assessment of the factors influencing the performance of the adoption of green logistics in urban tourism in Thailand's eastern economic corridor. Social Sciences. 2023; 12(5): 300. doi: 10.3390/socsci12050300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12050300

28. Santos J, Bressi S, Cerezo V, et al. SUP&R DSS: A sustainability-based decision support system for road pavements. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 206: 524–540. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.308

29. Huang Y, Qiao Z, Zhang H. Evaluation of an economy-technology-green development system for asphalt pavement construction in China based on synergetics. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 289: 125132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125132

30. Mosier RD, Gransberg DD. Carbon Footprint Cost Index: A Pavement Case Study. Procedia Engineering. 2015; 118: 781–786. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.514

31. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

32. Hair JF. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage; 2014.