Advancements in battery technology: A comprehensive review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18686/cest573Keywords:
battery technology; lithium-ion batteries; electric vehicles; graphene batteries; solid-state batteries; battery management systems; energy storageAbstract
This review presents a comprehensive examination of recent advancements in battery technology, a field that continues to underpin the rapid growth of portable electronics, electric vehicles (EVs), and large-scale energy storage systems. It begins with an overview of conventional battery chemistries, outlining the operating principles, performance metrics, and commercial relevance of both primary systems—such as alkaline and zinccarbon—and secondary systems including nickel–cadmium (NiCd), nickel–metal hydride (NiMH), and the diverse family of lithiumion batteries. Particular attention is given to widely used Liion chemistries such as lithium cobalt oxide (LCO), lithium manganese oxide (LMO), lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC), lithium iron phosphate (LFP), and lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA), highlighting their strengths, limitations, and evolving roles in modern applications. The review then explores emerging trends shaping the next generation of EV batteries, with a special focus on the integration of graphene and other advanced carbon materials to enhance conductivity, stability, and energy density. Developments in solid-state batteries, hybrid lithium-ion capacitors, and innovative manufacturing techniques are also discussed, alongside progress in fastcharging technologies and intelligent Battery Management Systems (BMS). Sustainability remains a central theme throughout the paper, emphasizing the importance of recycling strategies, material recovery, and ethical sourcing of critical minerals. The review concludes by assessing current market trajectories and identifying key challenges that must be addressed to achieve safer, more efficient, and environmentally responsible energy storage solutions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibraheem Redhwi, Saad Almalki, Haytham Radhwi, Abdulmohssin Jarwali, Ali Abaaltahin, Ahmad Fallatah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2019. Press release. Available online: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2019/press-release/ (accessed on 4 August 2025).
2. Energizer. Available online: https://energizer.com/batteries/energizer-max-alkaline-batteries (accessed on 4 August 2025).
3. Advantages and Limitations of Zinc Carbon Batteries. Available online: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=22363 (accessed on 4 August 2025).
4. Battery Council International. About Lead Batteries. Available online: https://batterycouncil.org/battery-facts-and-applications/about-lead-batteries (accessed on 4 August 2025).
5. Used Household Batteries. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/recycle/used-household-batteries (accessed on 4 August 2025).
6. Arun V, Kannan R, Ramesh S, et al. Review on li‐ion battery vs nickel metal hydride battery in EV. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022; 2022(1): 7910072. doi: 10.1155/2022/7910072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7910072
7. BU-205: Types of Lithium-ion. Available online: https://www.batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-205-types-of-lithium-ion/ (accessed on 4 August 2025).
8. Lithium Manganese Oxide. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/lithium-manganese-oxide (accessed on 4 August 2025).
9. Nickel Manganese Cobalt. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nickel-manganese-cobalt (accessed on 4 August 2025).
10. Lithium Iron Phosphate. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/lithium-iron-phosphate (accessed on 4 August 2025).
11. Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/lithium-nickel-cobalt-aluminum-oxide (accessed on 4 August 2025).
12. Future Battery Industries Cooperative Research Centre. Development of Electrolytes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. Future Battery Industries Cooperative Research Centre; 2023. Available online: https://poweringaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/PA-Development-of-Electrolytes-for-Vanadium-Redox-Flow-Batteries.pdf
13. Dieterle M, Fischer P, Pons MN, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for flow batteries: A review of methodological decisions. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022; 53: 102457. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102457
14. Puleston T, Serra M, Costa-Castelló R. Vanadium redox flow battery capacity loss mitigation strategy based on a comprehensive analysis of electrolyte imbalance effects. Applied Energy. 2024; 355: 122271. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122271
15. Puleston T, Cecilia A, Costa-Castelló R, et al. Vanadium redox flow batteries real-time State of Charge and State of Health estimation under electrolyte imbalance condition. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 68: 107666. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107666
16. Sánchez-Díez E, Ventosa E, Guarnieri M, et al. Redox flow batteries: Status and perspective towards sustainable stationary energy storage. Journal of Power Sources. 2021; 481: 228804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228804
17. Issa TB, Van Yken J, Singh P, et al. Advancements and Applications of Redox Flow Batteries in Australia. Batteries. 2025; 11(2): 78. doi: 10.3390/batteries11020078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11020078
18. Krowne CM. Measures of Performance of Vanadium and Other Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2024; 171(5): 050538. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad4824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ad4824
19. Kiasari M, Ghaffari M, Aly HH. A Comprehensive Review of the Current Status of Smart Grid Technologies for Renewable Energies Integration and Future Trends: The Role of Machine Learning and Energy Storage Systems. Energies. 2024; 17(16): 4128. doi: 10.3390/en17164128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164128
20. Aramendia I, Fernandez-Gamiz U, Martinez-San-Vicente A, et al. Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: A Review Oriented to Fluid-Dynamic Optimization. Energies. 2020; 14(1): 176. doi: 10.3390/en14010176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010176
21. Iwakiri I, Antunes T, Almeida H, et al. Redox Flow Batteries: Materials, Design and Prospects. Energies. 2021; 14(18): 5643. doi: 10.3390/en14185643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185643
22. Sharma J, Kulshrestha V. Advancements in polyelectrolyte membrane designs for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB). Results in Chemistry. 2023; 5: 100892. doi: 10.1016/j.rechem.2023.100892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.100892
23. McCloy R, Li Y, Bao J, et al. Electrolyte flow rate control for vanadium redox flow batteries using the linear parameter varying framework. Journal of Process Control. 2022; 115: 36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.04.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.04.021
24. Hudak NS. Nanostructured Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Lithium-Ion Batteries: Advances and Applications. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 57–82. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00004-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00004-2
25. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, et al. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nature Materials. 2012; 11(1): 19–29. doi: 10.1038/nmat3191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3191
26. Banerjee A, Wang X, Fang C, et al. Interfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes. Chemical Reviews. 2020; 120(14): 6878–6933. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101
27. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J-M. Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science. 2011; 334(6058): 928–935. doi: 10.1126/science.1212741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212741
28. Ellingsen LA, Majeau‐Bettez G, Singh B, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium‐Ion Battery Vehicle Pack. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2014; 18(1): 113–124. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12072
29. Lin X, Khosravinia K, Hu X, et al. Lithium Plating Mechanism, Detection, and Mitigation in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2012; 87: 100953. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953
30. Buentello-Montoya DA, Zhang X, Li J. The use of gasification solid products as catalysts for tar reforming. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019; 107: 399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.021
31. Harper G, Sommerville R, Kendrick E, et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature. 2019; 575(7781): 75–86. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5
32. Gaines L. Lithium-ion battery recycling processes: Research towards a sustainable course. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2018; 17: e00068. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00068
33. Zhang Q, Lin D, Deng B, et al. Flyweight, Superelastic, Electrically Conductive, and Flame-Retardant 3D Multi-Nanolayer Graphene/Ceramic Metamaterial. Advanced Materials. 2017; 29(28): 1605506. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605506
34. Ma Y, Chang H, Zhang M, et al. Graphene-Based Materials for Lithium-Ion Hybrid Supercapacitors. Advanced Materials. 2015; 27: 5296–5308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501622
35. Graphene's Game-Changing Role in Batteries and Energy Storage Systems. Available online: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=24254 (accessed on 4 August 2025).
36. El-Kady MF, Shao Y, Kaner RB. Graphene for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond. Nature Reviews Materials. 2016; 1(7): 16033. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.33
37. Stoller MD, Park S, Zhu Y, et al. Graphene-Based Ultracapacitors. Nano Letters. 2008; 8(10): 3498–3502. doi: 10.1021/nl802558y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802558y
38. Novoselov KS, Fal′ko VI, Colombo L, et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature. 2012; 490(7419): 192–200. doi: 10.1038/nature11458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11458
39. Blog, News, Insights & More. Available online: https://crownelectricmobility.com/blogs/graphene-battery-future (accessed on 4 August 2025).
40. Goodenough JB, Kim Y. Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries. Chemistry of Materials. 2010; 22(3): 587–603. doi: 10.1021/cm901452z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm901452z
41. Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nature. 2008; 451(7179): 652–657. doi: 10.1038/451652a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/451652a
42. Abakumov AM, Fedotov SS, Antipov EV, et al. Solid state chemistry for developing better metal-ion batteries. Nature Communications. 2020; 11: 4976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18736-7
43. Janek J, Zeier WG. A solid future for battery development. Nature Energy. 2016; 1(9): 16141. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.141
44. Kasavajjula U, Wang C, Appleby AJ. Nano- and bulk-silicon-based insertion anodes for lithium-ion secondary cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2007; 163(2): 1003–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084
45. Zubi G, Dufo-López R, Carvalho M, et al. The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 89: 292–308. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002
46. Tapaskar RP, Revankar PP, Ganachari SV. Advancements in battery management systems for electric vehicles: A MATLAB-based simulation of 4S3P lithium-ion battery packs. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2024; 15(6): 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15060222
47. Yu X, Manthiram A. A review of composite polymer-ceramic electrolytes for lithium batteries. Energy Storage Materials. 2021; 34: 282–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.006
48. Zhao C, Sun Q, Cui R, et al. Carrier diffusion coefficient is independent of defects in CH3NH3PbBr3 single crystals: Direct evidence. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2021; 58: 441–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.021
49. Karimi G, Li X. Thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Thermal management of Li-ion battery packs. International Journal of Energy Research. 2013; 37(1): 13–24. doi: 10.1002/er.1956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1956
50. Rahman Z, Kumar Das S. Ionic liquids for sustainable energy-storage devices. In: Ionic Liquid-Based Technologies for Environmental Sustainability. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 189–205. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824545-3.00012-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824545-3.00012-X
51. Warner JT. Next generation and beyond lithium chemistries. In: Lithium-Ion Battery Chemistries: A Primer. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 253–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814778-8.00010-7
52. Karaman C, Kariper IA, Karaman O Uranium-based electrode material for the high-performance supercapacitors. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 72(Part E): 108654. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108654
53. Li J, Liang H, Rehan MA, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of a two-phase flow model considering bubble coverage for alkaline electrolytic water. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2024; 245: 122890. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122890
54. He J, Wang C, Huang Y. Thermal Management and Performance Optimization in High-Power-Density Lithium-Ion Battery Modules. Energies. 2025; 18(9): 2294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092294
55. Jahanbin A, Abdolmalek L, Berardi U. Techno-economic feasibility of integrating hybrid battery-hydrogen energy storage system into an academic building. Energy Conversion and Management. 2024; 309: 118445. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118445
56. Vu TD, Xie H, Wang S, et al. Durable vanadium dioxide with 33-year service life for smart windows applications. Materials Today Energy. 2022; 26: 100978. doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.100978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2022.100978
57. Nykvist B, Nilsson M. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nature Climate Change. 2015; 5(4): 329–332. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2564
58. International Energy Agency (IEA). Global EV Outlook 2023. IEA; 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023




.jpg)
.jpg)
