Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable microgrids integrating solar, wind, and biomass for rural electrification

Authors

Article ID: 635
127 Views

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18686/cest635

Keywords:

hybrid renewable microgrid; multi-objective optimization; NSGA-II; solar-wind-biomass integration; rural electrification

Abstract

 Rural electrification in developing regions requires decentralized, sustainable energy systems that balance cost, reliability, and environmental performance. Hybrid renewable microgrids integrating solar, wind, and biomass have been studied extensively. However, existing methods frequently rely on generic component models and simplified operational methods, limiting their applicability to region-specific conditions. This study addresses these limitations through three novel contributions. (a) It develops Tamil Nadu-specific biomass feedstock modelling that incorporates seasonal agricultural residue availability and local gasification characteristics. (b) It implements integrated sizing and operation optimization using hourly dispatch decisions within the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). (c) It conducts a comprehensive 6-parameter sensitivity analysis to quantify model robustness under realistic uncertainty. The model optimizes hybrid microgrids integrating solar photovoltaic, wind turbine, biomass gasifier, and lithium-ion battery subsystems. Three conflicting objectives are minimized: Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP), and carbon dioxide emissions. A case study of 350 rural households in Tamil Nadu validates the approach using hourly meteorological and load data with regionally calibrated techno-economic parameters. Results prove that hybrid configurations substantially outperform single-source systems across all metrics. Pareto-optimal solutions reveal critical trade-offs between economic, technical, and environmental objectives. Sensitivity analysis identifies demand growth, wind variability, and battery efficiency as dominant drivers of model robustness, while financial parameters primarily influence cost feasibility. The results validate region-specific hybrid microgrid optimization as a technically and economically viable pathway for sustainable rural electrification, providing policymakers with actionable insights on system sizing, resource management, and investment prioritization.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-13

How to Cite

M. Ali, H., Choudhary, P. K., Lazer, A. J. P., Nuthakki, P., Smerat, A., Sunderaraj, N., Sabirov, S., & Sengan, S. (2026). Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable microgrids integrating solar, wind, and biomass for rural electrification. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest635

Issue

Section

Article

References

1. Whba R. Renewable Energy in Developing Countries: Insight into Challenges, Policy, and Financing. In: Su'ait MS, Jarimi H, Noor SAM (editors). Renewable Energy Technologies and Strategies in the Global Energy Transition. ACS Publications; 2025. pp. 15–38. doi: 10.1021/bk-2025-1499.ch002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2025-1499.ch002

2. Kolati Y, Raghutla C. Do renewable energy sources and energy infrastructure contribute to mitigating energy poverty? Exploring uncharted dynamics. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2025; 58: 101687. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101687

3. Kandasamy R, Ramesh R, Natashen RK, et al. Investigating the Challenges of Deploying Renewable Energy Technologies in Rural Areas. In: Manickam T, Ananthan S, Gopalakrishnan S, et al. (editors). Advances in Wireless Technologies and Telecommunication. IGI Global; 2024. pp. 215–238. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-7788-8.ch009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7788-8.ch009

4. Ariyo B, Adesina L, Ogunbiyi O. Advanced Microgrid Systems: Bridging the Gap between Renewable Energy Integration, Stability, and Scalable Deployment—A Review. Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews. 2025; 2(2): 105. doi: 10.5455/JERR.20250115065930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/JERR.20250115065930

5. Zhang L, Ma Z, Jia C, et al. A Novel Hierarchical Optimal Scheduling and Coordination Control Method for Microgrid Based on Multi-Energy Complementarity. Electronics. 2025; 14(9): 1829. doi: 10.3390/electronics14091829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14091829

6. Rico-Riveros LF, Trujillo-Rodríguez CL, Díaz-Aldana NL, et al. Analysis of a Sustainable Hybrid Microgrid Based on Solar Energy, Biomass, and Storage for Rural Electrification in Isolated Communities. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(19): 10646. doi: 10.3390/app151910646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910646

7. Hamid A. Smart Grid-Based Integration of Renewable Energy: Toward a Flexible Power System in Iraq. Dijlah Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2025; 2(3). Available online: https://journal.duc.edu.iq/index.php/djst/article/view/185

8. Ahmad Khan A, Faiz Minai A, Godi RK, et al. Optimal Sizing, Techno-Economic Feasibility and Reliability Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy System: A Systematic Review of Energy Storage Systems' Integration. IEEE Access. 2025; 13: 59198–59226. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535520

9. Giedraityte A, Rimkevicius S, Marciukaitis M, et al. Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems—A Review of Optimization Approaches and Future Challenges. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(4): 1744. doi: 10.3390/app15041744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041744

10. Shrivastav AK, Dutta S. Multi-objective optimization of hybrid microgrid for energy trilemma goals using slime mould algorithm. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 29242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15207-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15207-1

11. Thirunavukkarasu M, Sawle Y, Lala H. A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems using various optimization techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023; 176: 113192. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113192

12. Bamisile O., Cai D, Adun H, et al. Towards renewables development: Review of optimization techniques for energy storage and hybrid renewable energy systems. Heliyon. 2024; 10(19): e37482. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37482

13. Moosavi M, Olamaei J, Shourkaei HM. Optimizing microgrid performance: A multi-objective strategy for integrated energy management with hybrid sources and demand response. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 17827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00118-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00118-y

14. Nallolla CA, P V, Chittathuru D, et al. Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for a Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid Using RES: A Comprehensive Review. Electronics. 2023; 12(4): 1062. doi: 10.3390/electronics12041062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12041062

15. Zhang J, Wei H. A review on configuration optimization of hybrid energy system based on renewable energy. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022; 10: 977925. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.977925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.977925

16. Ajiboye OK, Ochiegbu CV, Ofosu EA, et al. A review of hybrid renewable energies optimisation: design, methodologies, and criteria. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2023; 42(1): 648–684. doi: 10.1080/14786451.2023.2227294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2227294

17. Kumar RP, Karthikeyan G. A multi-objective optimization solution for distributed generation energy management in microgrids with hybrid energy sources and battery storage system. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024; 75: 109702. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109702

18. Mathaba TND, Abo‐Al‐Ez K. Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: Integrating Multi‐Objective Optimization into a Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Framework. Engineering Reports. 2025; 7(1): e13074. doi: 10.1002/eng2.13074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.13074

19. Samy MM, Elkhouly HI, Barakat S. Multi‐objective optimization of hybrid renewable energy system based on biomass and fuel cells. International Journal of Energy Research. 2021; 45(6): 8214–8230. doi: 10.1002/er.5815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5815

20. Krishnamoorthy M, Natarajan M, Periyanayagam AR, et al. Optimal sizing and feasibility analysis of hybrid energy microgrid system using multi‐objective moth swarm algorithm. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2025; 45(1): e70122. doi: 10.1002/ep.70122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70122

21. Bade SO, Tomomewo OS, Meenakshisundaram A, et al. Multi-Criteria Optimization of a Hybrid Renewable Energy System Using Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Sizing and Performance Evaluation. Clean Technologies. 2025; 7(1): 23. doi: 10.3390/cleantechnol7010023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7010023

22. Taghizad-Tavana K, Esmaeel Nezhad A, Hagh MT, et al. Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Off-Grid Electrification: A Comprehensive Review of Storage Technologies, Metaheuristic Optimization Approaches and Key Challenges. Eng. 2025; 6(11): 309. doi: 10.3390/eng6110309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6110309

23. Lal S, Fuskele V, Hussain S, et al. Assessing Solar-Biomass System for Rural Electrification in India Using the Integrated Multi-Objective Optimization and TOPSIS. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2025; 11(22S). Available online: https://theaspd.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/7962

24. Roy D, Taghavifar H, Shivaprasad KV, et al. Multi-criteria decision-making and uncertainty analyses of off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems for an island community. Energy Conversion and Management. 2025; 343: 120120. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120120

25. Alsharafa NS, Shanmugam SK, Vani B, et al. Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Efficient Maximum Power Point Tracking to Improve Photovoltaic Efficiency. Journal of Machine and Computing. 2024; 575–585. doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202404055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53759/7669/jmc202404055

26. Niu Y, Mohammed Merza A, Ibraheem Kadhem S, et al. Evaluation of wind-solar hybrid power generation system based on Monte Carlo method. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE). 2023; 13(4): 4401. doi: 10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4401-4411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4401-4411

27. Deghoum K, Gherbi MT, Sultan HS, et al. Optimization of Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Based on Aerodynamic, Steady-State, and Dynamic Analyses. Applied System Innovation. 2023; 6(2): 33. doi: 10.3390/asi6020033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6020033

28. Bijan ZAJ, Foroughian S, Hasanzadeh S, et al. Integrating Renewable Energy Systems: A Review of Economic Strategies and Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2025 12th Iranian Conference on Renewable Energies and Distributed Generation (ICREDG); 26 February 2025; Qom, Iran. pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ICREDG66184.2025.10966119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREDG66184.2025.10966119

29. Mohammed MN, Aljibori HSS, Jameel Al-Tamimi AN, et al. Toward Sustainable Smart Cities in Bahrain: A Study on Power Generation Using Speed Breakers for Enhanced Energy Efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 2024 Arab ICT Conference (AICTC); 27–28 February 2024; Manama, Bahrain. pp. 214–219. doi: 10.1109/AICTC58357.2024.10735031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AICTC58357.2024.10735031

30. Sezavar HR, Karimi H, Hasanzadeh S, et al. Enhancing Overcurrent Relay Performance in Power Systems with Distributed Generation: An AI-Based Approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th Iranian Conference on Renewable Energies and Distributed Generation; 26 February 2025; Qom, Iran. doi: 10.1109/ICREDG66184.2025.10966087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREDG66184.2025.10966087